It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:51 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 9
  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I am too confused, why these images r being called anamorphic

viewtopic.php?t=4528
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2004 10:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Someone, possibly Kabir, said the silver cover version is anamorphic, but perhaps it is the same as the red cover. Anyone know for sure?
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2004 8:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
arsh wrote:
I am too confused, why these images r being called anamorphic

viewtopic.php?t=4528


These shots from older release, most likely, are not anamorphic. (Screen capture with incorrect settings).

The new release, IS ANAMORPHIC. I have checked it (my recent purchase).

Rana
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
Kabir wrote:
[color=#000000]Kandukondain Kandukondain




Image





It's very easy to get to exact this shot. Aish's head moves a lot frame to frame. Just match Head to the Widow frame (inner border) and you get exact same frame.

Anamorphic version:
(Time = 09:13 in anamorphic DVD)
The anamorphic version has a bit extra on the sides. Top is very slightly matted. Top of anamorphic version frame cuts off at Ash's nose tip. Bottom is matted less than half of what's matted at top.

Add a little on the sides, cut a little from top and bottom, correct the geometry of the above shot and math will work out to 2.2:1.

Rana


Last edited by rana on Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Is this a cut and paste shot, rana? or u actually took it from ur dvd!
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Quote:
Shahran Sunny Audit



Joined: 03 Dec 2001
Posts: 823
Location: London, UK
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 5:20 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ayngaran have already done an amamorphic transfer of the film in 2.35:1 OAR. This transfer can be seen on a few of thier song DVD titles. However this is done in interpostive and they have no plans to re-do the transfer as Rajiv Menon is not intrested in supervising another transfer of this film after doing it twice for Ayngaran and once for Channel Four.

Rajiv Menon is working on his next untitled Tamil film that is due in 2004.
_________________
You want to read this part of my msg....why? What will you get out of it....? Would you think that by reading this you would have tried to find a way to understand me? Or that you feel some hidden message about forthcoming DVDs might be within the realms of this signature? You poor creature!

Back to top



seems like this is THE END of KK!
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
arsh wrote:
Is this a cut and paste shot, rana? or u actually took it from ur dvd!


That shot is 'quote' from Kabir's opening post in this thread. This is the one with incorrect AR.

I described Anamorphic pic in words.
May be, when you get KK DVD you can post exact same shot. It's very easy to get exact same shot. It's at 09:13 in anam version.

Rana
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I'll do so, So, u r saying OAR for KK, is not 2.35:1 but 2.20:1? How abt KM???
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
arsh wrote:
I'll do so, So, u r saying OAR for KK, is not 2.35:1 but 2.20:1? How abt KM???


Oh No. I'm not saying that. I didn't check/ calculate anam DTS DVD's AR. It does contain a little extra on the sides (and a bit less on top and bottom) as compared to Kabir posted screen caps on p 1 of this thread.

Rana
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
KM, seems like rightfully framed DVD!
Top
 Profile  
 
urbanlegend
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
Thanks to Arsh for these updated comparison shots! :D

Menu from the Anamorphic DVD:

Image

Image

Image

Comparison DVD Shots...Above Anamorphic, Below Widescreen:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Extra Shot from Widescreen version:

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Here u go RANA!!

OOPS!! my BAD!! Many Thnx to URBAN LEGEND, for doing this favour to me!! :P
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
Isn't anamorphic traeatment supposed to improve the PQ??

Then what happened here?? Anamorphic version is Field Averaged and the older Letterboxed version is Film to NTSC telecine (Pseudo-prog).

Any doubts that Field Averaging is a no no??

Rana
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
LOOKs like PARSAD did this WONDERFUL collector EDITION for us!!?

What will u buy, ANAMORPHIC/DTS or CROPPED/DD? Ur choice!!

BTW!! none was DONE BY BEI, so BENEFICIARY is AYANGRAN, both ways!

but one thing is OBVIOUS imho, their DVD QUALITY/AUTHORING is GONE DOWNHILL!!
Top
 Profile  
 
DragunR2
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
The anamorphic version is a fuller aspect ratio and appears to have better colors, but is softer than the cropped version. Frustrating!
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 9
  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group