It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:08 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Are those titles released?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Shahran Sunny Audit wrote:

Also why don't you see thier new DVDs of P.Saravanan, Engal Anna and Joot. This was done by a professional company in UK, who also do some work for Tartan. They have been transfer in anamorphic 2.45:1 (except for P.Saravanan which is 2.55:1), in 24fps, and have DTS and Dolby Option. Have a look and give us your comments.


I'm interested in seeing them, if it is by a professional company.

Quote:
The DVD
looks noisy/grainy and sharpness
is mediocre at best. If this was
made from the ON the result is quite disappointing. Compression problems too. It looks like mediocre video, not film.


Grain + low bit budget = disaster :shock:

I think they overloaded Kaaka Kaaka. The movie is about 2.5 hours long, with DD and DTS 5.1 tracks as well as a 2-ch commentary which, IIRC, was encoded at a higher than usual bitrate. Even on my 35" I thought there were some problems with detail. On a few random checks of the bitrate meter, it never climbed over 5 mbps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
well, just to keep single disc, u have to make, a lot of compromises, that r disastrous!

I'll advise, Ayangran, to come out first, with a single disc, prog encoded, anamorphic film dvd, with good details, no extras, no dts, for sell through point of view at reasonable price!, then follow it up, if film/dvd is a hit, with special 2 disc edition, possibly splitting DTS/DD on seperate discs? or DTS only, with extra features, that might not be in DTS! this special edition, should satisfy the hard core, collectors!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 5:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 12:28 am
Posts: 1373
Location: London, UK
DragunR2 wrote:

I think they overloaded Kaaka Kaaka. The movie is about 2.5 hours long, with DD and DTS 5.1 tracks as well as a 2-ch commentary which, IIRC, was encoded at a higher than usual bitrate. Even on my 35" I thought there were some problems with detail. On a few random checks of the bitrate meter, it never climbed over 5 mbps.


Actually this is no different to the region one of Catch Me if You Can or Gladiator. The film was about 2.5 hours and had DTS/Dolby option with an addtional 5.1 track in French and 2.0 track in English.

Why should Ayngaran release the film twice when they can get it right the first time. Besides I have grown to love DTS and I would prefer to have this option on all releases and not just big hits.

They tried the DTS and Dolby separate disc formula with Anbe Sivam but the DVD costs didn't justify with the intake revenue. You mustn't forget that this is a minority market...not bollywood...so they must be extra careful on thier budget restraints. Under these circumstances they do the best they can. Name me one recent multi million dollor conglomerate EROS DVD product that matches with any of Ayngaran Products!!!!

Just compare LOC or Kakhee DVDs with one Kaaka Kaaka or Boys DVD. Even thier 1998 DVD titles like Vathapollae is miles better!!!

You should reserve your battles for quality on EROS, VIDEO-SOUND, GVI and YASH RAJ products who have the $$$ and the audiences yet they still rip us off!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 10:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 8:14 pm
Posts: 1086
Shahran Sunny Audit wrote:
Actually this is no different to the region one of Catch Me if You Can or Gladiator. The film was about 2.5 hours and had DTS/Dolby option with an addtional 5.1 track in French and 2.0 track in English.

If it looked like Gladiator nobody
would complain. :-) I wouldn't
complain if it looked like grainy
OCN. But it looks like noisy video.
Quote:
Name me one recent multi million dollor conglomerate EROS DVD product that matches with any of Ayngaran Products!!!!

I actually prefer the older Ayngaran titles to the newer ones
I have seen. And I prefer some Eros
to Kaka.
Quote:
You should reserve your battles for quality on EROS, VIDEO-SOUND, GVI and YASH RAJ products who have the $$$ and the audiences yet they still rip us off!!!

They all deserve criticism. Ayngaran needs to be aplauded for
trying to improve. Now if only
they would go from trying to
achieving.
The Kaka DVD is progressive. But
it's not the kind of progressive
that makes sense. What they did is
use an interlaced transfer with 2:3
pulldown and put it interlaced on
the disc! The only difference to
EROS DVDs with 2:3 pulldown is that
they flag the fields that make a
frame in the stream as a frame. So
we get the 30 clicks per second
and a sequence of frames and fields
when stepping through the disc. This helps players that rely on flags only to some extent. But it
does not save bits since it still
encodes 60 fields per second instead of 24 frames! They should
do real progressive and store and
encode every field only once. They
really need all the bits they have
for their DTS and grainy masters.
So, Sunny, what is the best Ayngaran DVD mastered in India
so far concerning image quality?
It's not "Kaka Kaka". Which title
is it in your opinion? Are there
any with real progressive mastering
(48 fields stored per second, output as 24 frames)?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Quote:
They all deserve criticism. Ayngaran needs to be aplauded for
trying to improve. Now if only
they would go from trying to
achieving.
The Kaka DVD is progressive. But
it's not the kind of progressive
that makes sense.


I have not seen above mentioned dvds by ayangran, but if Ayangran, for any reason, try to pack, 3 hrs film, prog, anamorphic, with DD, DTS, and extras, keep as single disc, for economics reason, and it comes out to be like Kaaka, boys, viramundan..

Then, imho, Ayangran r hopeless!! they r loosers as far quality is concerned! no one should claim, that those r quality dvds! they r craop, prog dvds! imho.

I again, as said previously, still think, their older, pseudo prog stuff, even cropped, looks better than their current, prog junk..again with apologies to sunny..

It is not matter of fight!

EROS..are HOPELESS..in DITCH! big time..DOODOO..If Ayangran is going in same direction, like YRF too...I refuse to give their dvds a chance for $20...I dont think, with DTS etc, they r worth it!!!

I dont think, any one with their senses would claim, that AYANGRAN r AUTHORONG, giving us BEST QUALITY stuff!!

I love DTS, but I dont care abt DTS on a BAD PQ DVD! period!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: AYANGRAN PROG VS STUMBLE
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Image

Image

Image

Image

and now from stumble dvd rip:

Image

Image

***VIRAMUNDI is even worse, no SHOTS available!!!!!

Which transfer you guys prefer?

If u still prfer BOYS, KAAKA over stumble, then GOD HELPS YOU!ZULM is HANDS OFF!! :nopity:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 6:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Any comments? mhafner, dragun, ali, rana, UL,and other guys with 20/20 GOOD VISION..LOL?

Are u speechless, or Afraid? :baaa: :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 6:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
Let's see how Stumble looks with bigger shots from the actual DVD. Those shots look decent though.

I think Sunny said the Kaaka Kaaka shots were from DVD-R, but the finished DVD also had some compression artifacts.

Has anyone seen the Telugu DVD Lakshmi Kataksham, which claims to be progressive? I wonder if it has the same encoding problems as Kaaka Kaaka.

EVP did separate DD and DTS releases for Okkadu (also Nee Sneham?) and though I haven't seen the actual DVD (all the shops here carry pirate copies :x ), the shots look more like old school Ayngaran.

viewtopic.php?t=4569&highlight=okkadu

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 7:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I have seen KAAKA KAAKA Orig DVD, and I can assure, u, it is no way better! than these shots? you have DVD too, ? the others r even worse!imho.

Any ways, Sunny thinks, I am cynical? well, NP, let it be like that!

But, i'll say, if I think, it is not GOOD!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 7:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
These r washed out, MATTE looking pictures, man come on, look at sharpness, detail, contrast, precision, gloss!!! What r u talking abt?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:38 pm
Posts: 408
The Nee Sneham DVD was better in PQ than Okkadu. I will capture some screenshots when I find time

I have the Lakshmi Kataksham DVD. How do I verify if the DVD is like Kakka kakka as described by mhafner.?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 9:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
arsh wrote:
I have seen KAAKA KAAKA Orig DVD, and I can assure, u, it is no way better! than these shots? you have DVD too, ? the others r even worse!imho.


I thought Kaaka Kaaka looked okay on my 35" but it definitely had problems with compression and detail. Definitely not as good as other Ayngarans on my TV. I lent it to someone, so I can't look at it right now.

Quote:
These r washed out, MATTE looking pictures, man come on, look at sharpness, detail, contrast, precision, gloss!!! What r u talking abt?


They're not reference screenshots. They are grainy and soft, but imagine what they would look like with both DD and DTS on the same disc. Grain and softness with compression artifacts added. My point was that perhaps Ayngaran should have put either dropped the idea of DTS altogether or to put it on a separate disc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 9:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
np, dragun, i did comment and these screen shots, do show kaaka a bit better than other..I'll laterz submit, viramundi and original stumble..

but i dont see any doubts, my self!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2004 9:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2001 3:16 am
Posts: 4259
These shots sum up our feelings on Ayngaran currently:

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group