ali wrote:
rana wrote:
Ali, you say Indian DVD quality has generally improved. Do you mean "IMPROVED" over what used to be available in the last 2 yrs or you also include DEI-EROS DVDs of older times.
Wasn’t thinking of DEI really, more about the recent DVD companies that were churning the same dismal DVDs over and over again.
rana wrote:
I would still prefer old DEI-EROS letterboxed Progressive '2 Ch audio' DVDs over DVD from a new PAL master converted to NTSC, field averaged even though they may be Anamorphic as well as DD 5.1.
I’ve never really liked the letter boxed cropped DVDs that DEI did and don’t understand this fascination with getting the best quality transfers when about a third of the picture has been cropped off. If Eros released the a Satya DVD today and it was similar quality of its recent releases (Chocolate, Pyaar Mein Twist, No Entry, Ramji Londonwaley, Matrubhoomi) - I would choose the new anamorphic transfer with 5.1 even if it was PAL to NTSC just because to get to see full frame of picture as it was intended to seen.
Ali
I kind of agree.
DVD quality includes Picture Quality, Original Aspect Ratio presentation, Audio etc.
But, as far as, PQ is concerned, DEI-EROS 1.85:1 Progressive even letterboxed ones are better than PAL to NTSC converted field averaged interlaced DVDs even if these are anamorphic. As the new crop is better audio wise and almost always OAR, counting all aspects of a DVD, new crop may rate better.
But, for my viewing, first priority is PQ.
One example: DEI-EROS SHOLAY that contains only 45% of the picture of EROS's Director's Cut DVD and still many prefer DEI-EROS DVD.