It is currently Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:54 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 9 of 17
  [ 247 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 17  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
mhafner
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 8:14 pm
Posts: 1086
rana wrote:
rana wrote:

EROS DVD is PAL to NTSC (or 25 to 60 converted) converted Field Averaged.


rana wrote:
I hope I'm wrong on this one and the one for shipment in India is the real PAL version which should be Progressive by default if Telecine was in PAL. Note that EROS colored MEA is PAL to NTSC converted Field Averaged. Most likely, Shemaroo overseas version is really PAL to NTSC converted Field Averaged, just like EROS's.


Shemaroo DVD is NTSC and is Pseudo-Progressive. DVD cover states, "For distribution in India Nepal and Bhutan only"
(But, usual chroma lagging behind luminance problem; hence, pixel comparing routines may or may not detect the 2-3 pull down)

Bit rate is 3.5-5 mbps. Audio is DD 5.1 @ 384 kbps


What? They have STILL not fixed this after all these years? MORONS!
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
mhafner wrote:
rana wrote:
rana wrote:

EROS DVD is PAL to NTSC (or 25 to 60 converted) converted Field Averaged.


rana wrote:
I hope I'm wrong on this one and the one for shipment in India is the real PAL version which should be Progressive by default if Telecine was in PAL. Note that EROS colored MEA is PAL to NTSC converted Field Averaged. Most likely, Shemaroo overseas version is really PAL to NTSC converted Field Averaged, just like EROS's.


Shemaroo DVD is NTSC and is Pseudo-Progressive. DVD cover states, "For distribution in India Nepal and Bhutan only"
(But, usual chroma lagging behind luminance problem; hence, pixel comparing routines may or may not detect the 2-3 pull down)

Bit rate is 3.5-5 mbps. Audio is DD 5.1 @ 384 kbps


What? They have STILL not fixed this after all these years? MORONS!



Ha ha! Fix and HINDI DVDS MANUFACTURER!

some one pinch me! :shock: :twisted:
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
rana wrote:
TheDUde wrote:
Hi !

I rented this DVD by mail and received a DVD+R ! :lol:

Normally, that would not be so bad if it was a prefect copy, but this one is DVD-5 (ie 4.5 GB).

Am I correct to assume that the EROS DVD is DVD-9 (ie 8.5 GB) ?

If so, then it seems that this place does not have dual-layer-burners and so used DVD-Shrink (or equivalent) to put the movie on a single layer DVD.


Sure, you got a a, first generation or further, shrunk copy of EROS Mughl-e-Azam. EROS M-E-A is Field Averaged. Shemaroo (Arsh, shots please) is Pseudo-Progressive and way better. Both are close to 8 GB on main feature disc plus the extras disc.


I'll send to ali or legend today!
thnx for reminder!
Top
 Profile  
 
ali
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 11:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Shemeroo MEG DVD - screen shots thanks to Arsh;

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Ali
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 11:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Image

Image

Image

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Image

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
mhafner
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 8:14 pm
Posts: 1086
The colors look artificial and flat.
Top
 Profile  
 
urbanlegend
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 3:37 pm
Posts: 3051
Location: Somewhere in time...
Here is a negative from the film MEA courtesy Rana Saab ..

.. I dont have a negative scanner therefore used a regular scanner to scan it:

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
mhafner wrote:
The colors look artificial and flat.


indeed they were , from day one, artificial, flat, crap, techni, the day this film was colored in any form.
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
urbanlegend wrote:
Here is a negative from the film MEA courtesy Rana Saab ..

.. I dont have a negative scanner therefore used a regular scanner to scan it:

Image


This negative scan is much worst than DVD, EROS or Shemaroo.
Why??
This negative shows what was shown in North American theatres. And they used scope lens which resulted in picture looking too fat?? What's the horizontal expansion ratio of scope lens??
Any comments??

Arsh, as per screen shots I hardly see Shemaroo any better than EROS?? This puzzles me. On my display, Shemaroo looks much better and sharper??
Any comments??
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Indeed I did too!! saw Shemaroo much better than Eros, much smoother especially in motion scenes etc and a bit otherise too!!

Whatever if panchand guru think Eros is better or same well, let it be! :roll:

But remember Screen shots are not always every thing, and XVID always look superior than ORIG DVD :?: :idea:
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Can gurus point out, which shots are Eros and Which Shemaroo, in comparison shots? just looking at PICTURE/PHOTO :roll:
Top
 Profile  
 
rana
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
arsh wrote:
Can gurus point out, which shots are Eros and Which Shemaroo, in comparison shots? just looking at PICTURE/PHOTO :roll:


It's beyond my eye/ PC-display resolution capability.

But, one thing for sure, EROS is Film to PAL to NTSC and runs 4% faster than Shemaroo's Film to NTSC DVD. (I started checking for run time descrepencies bet these two DVDs, old shemaroo B&W DVD and old VHS copy; it'll take very long time but I'll find out the differences).
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
bump


Last edited by Zoran009 on Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
ali
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
I can't tell the difference between the Eros and Shemaroo version - at least from the screen shots.. both look identical to me.

Ali
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 9 of 17
  [ 247 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 17  Next

Board index » Indian Media Forums » General

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group