It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:40 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Others » Movie, TV, Music and Box-office

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6 of 10
  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
rana wrote:
ali wrote:
I watched it last weekend and I can’t describe how disappointed I was with this movie. For a film that’s only 107mins it feels like lengthy 3hr movie; when a movie experience feels like that you know some thing has gone wrong with it. And it was a movie which I had been looking forward to watching for a very long time. Maybe a case of expectations not living up to what it could have been.

Amitabh Bachchan and Saif Ali Khan performances are always good – you sense the movie is made for AB and he does shine throughout it. The less said about the rest of the cast the better. Unbelievably Sanjay Dutt, Jackie Shroff (I remember seeing an interview with Jackie saying he will take any bit role in a VVC film no matter how small the role was, at least he is true to his word) & Jimmy Shergill roles are non-existent in the movie. And if you blink you might even miss the appearance of Sharmila Tagore.

Dissatisfied as I was with Eklavya, I have to say it’s beautifully shot movie and looks amazing. Bit thin on the plot and character development (you hardly feel anything for any one's character apart from Eklavya himself) but still looks a quality production you would expect from VVC. Maybe a second viewing (if a decent DVD appears) might change my opinion but disappointing is how I would describe this movie.

Ali


So, you are saying that everything is fantastic in Eklavya but film doesn't click. This is in direct contrast to V V C's prev film LRMB where nothing is extraordinary but it works.


I have to diff with ali bhaii, all Don, Dhooms, Lakshya, Johar, yrf productions are possibly considered quality products if your criteria are applied man :roll:

I just watched BABEL, and I felt cheated and heavily disappointed, while, cinema, back ground a, acting etc is all A1, but it does not add it all somehow imho!

Imho, Parinda was best of 3, MK was second, Eklavya, down some where! right next to Kareeb.

Parineeta and munna bhaii even all clicked were not above those 2 VVC flicks imho.

nevertheless, i do not even think that this is the most finest performance of AB or Saif either.

I prefer seeing AB in Khuda Gawah over this any day!

If you have seen it your self, I would like to hear from you too, what level product you think, this VVC venture is????? :idea:


Last edited by Zoran009 on Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Commando303
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Agreed: I prefer Amitabh Bachchan's part in the first half of Khuda Gawah, as well. Nonetheless, I felt that Bachchan was great in Eklavya; I just felt that Eklavya, per se, was not much better than "good": as many seem to be saying, the movie just ended up falling short of expectations.


Last edited by Commando303 on Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Mr_Khiladi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
arsh wrote:
I just watched BABEL, and I felt cheated and heavily disappointed, while, cinema, back ground a, acting etc is all A1, but it does not add it all somehow imho!


You were probably expecting too much. I thought it was quite good, but certainly not great. That's what happens when you listen to others opinions about a film, you may be expecting a masterpiece but when the film falls short of your expectations, you will be disappointed. But when it comes to bollywood, I'm usually still disappointed because most of those films fall short of the rather low expectations I already have for them. :roll: I was dreading Eklavya could be terrible but I gave it a chance and since it was better than terrible it wasn't that bad. Actually it had it's good and bad points. What was really bad was the film KANK, which I was also dreading may be a bad film but after seeing it, it was far worse than I could have ever possibly imagined. :x

Quote:
Imho, Parinda was best of 3, MK was second, Eklavya, down some where! right next to Kareeb.


I quite liked 1942 and would place it above MK, but agree Parinda is his best film. Eklavya is still better than Kareeb! But one scene that made me sick with Eklavya was when Eklavya was showing his knife-throwing skills with the bird. It's like VVC wanted us the be amazed with that scene that we would be in awe of Eklavya's skills, but the way it was shot looked so pathetic and laughable. I remember a white couple left the cinema just after that scene and I don't blame them.
Top
 Profile  
 
Commando303
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
I very much liked that scene. I agree, though, that expectations can have great influence over one's enjoyment of a film (or, really, of anything). I also feel that Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna fell short of my not-so-high expectations, though I didn't "hate" it the way some seem to have.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Commando303 wrote:
Agreed: I prefer Amitabh Bachchan's part in the first half of Khda Gawah, as well. Nonetheless, I felt that Bachchan was great in Eklavya; I just felt that Eklavya, per se, was not much better than "good": as many seem to be saying, the movie just ended up falling short of expectations.


I would barely call it reasonable!! nothing more, that will be consolation to VVC. This movie is not of the calibre of film maker vvc is, neverthless he did make a dud named kareeb!

Oh I forgot 1942 , indeed all 3, Parinda, 1942, Mk are better than Eklavya, I thought VVC tried to feed a lot of AB flavored cheese through this film
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
arsh wrote:
rana wrote:
ali wrote:
I watched it last weekend and I can’t describe how disappointed I was with this movie. For a film that’s only 107mins it feels like lengthy 3hr movie; when a movie experience feels like that you know some thing has gone wrong with it. And it was a movie which I had been looking forward to watching for a very long time. Maybe a case of expectations not living up to what it could have been.

Amitabh Bachchan and Saif Ali Khan performances are always good – you sense the movie is made for AB and he does shine throughout it. The less said about the rest of the cast the better. Unbelievably Sanjay Dutt, Jackie Shroff (I remember seeing an interview with Jackie saying he will take any bit role in a VVC film no matter how small the role was, at least he is true to his word) & Jimmy Shergill roles are non-existent in the movie. And if you blink you might even miss the appearance of Sharmila Tagore.

Dissatisfied as I was with Eklavya, I have to say it’s beautifully shot movie and looks amazing. Bit thin on the plot and character development (you hardly feel anything for any one's character apart from Eklavya himself) but still looks a quality production you would expect from VVC. Maybe a second viewing (if a decent DVD appears) might change my opinion but disappointing is how I would describe this movie.

Ali


So, you are saying that everything is fantastic in Eklavya but film doesn't click. This is in direct contrast to V V C's prev film LRMB where nothing is extraordinary but it works.


I have to diff with ali bhaii, all Don, Dhooms, Lakshya, Johar, yrf productions are possibly considered quality products if your criteria are applied man :roll:

I just watched BABEL, and I felt cheated and heavily disappointed, while, cinema, back ground a, acting etc is all A1, but it does not add it all somehow imho!

Imho, Parinda was best of 3, MK was second, Eklavya, down some where! right next to Kareeb.

Parineeta and munna bhaii even all clicked were not above those 2 VVC flicks imho.

nevertheless, i do not even think that this is the most finest performance of AB or Saif either.

I prefer seeing AB in Khuda Gawah over this any day!


So, ali bhaii!! Let me ask your bottom line, without any favortism to the director!

Did you like this film?? and if yes? then why?
Top
 Profile  
 
Mr_Khiladi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 2:39 am
Posts: 873
Commando303 wrote:
I very much liked that scene. I


How could you possibly like it? Do you have low expectations? The knife-throwing scene looked like they tried to make it look spectacular but it just fell flat. That scene was just cringe-worthy.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
Mr_Khiladi wrote:
Commando303 wrote:
I very much liked that scene. I


How could you possibly like it? Do you have low expectations? The knife-throwing scene looked like they tried to make it look spectacular but it just fell flat. That scene was just cringe-worthy.


why it was there in first place :roll:
Top
 Profile  
 
Anwar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:21 pm
Posts: 570
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Mr_Khiladi wrote:
Commando303 wrote:
I very much liked that scene. I


How could you possibly like it? Do you have low expectations? The knife-throwing scene looked like they tried to make it look spectacular but it just fell flat. That scene was just cringe-worthy.

I agree. It had no purpose in the story at all. The story itself is pretty weak. You would think that VVC would come up with something really extraordinary when he takes six years to write and make the film. Even most of the characters weren't developed well. I was disappointed too. The ending is so bad, while the movie actually starts off on a very promising note. Also, I think it's surprising when you make a movie that is not longer than 2 hours, yet it seems to drag. Vidya Balan, much like LAGE RAHO MUNNABHAI, has no role of substance at all. And you could just delete Chanda re from the movie without missing anything.
Top
 Profile  
 
Commando303
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:34 am
Posts: 978
Well, Mr_Khiladi, I liked it because I did find it exciting, and didn't feel that it "fell flat." On the contrary to low, my expectations from Eklavya were quite high; the film didn't meet them, but I certainly liked that seen very much. Again, I liked Eklavya; I just didn't "love" it.
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: Birmingham
arsh wrote:
arsh wrote:
rana wrote:
ali wrote:
I watched it last weekend and I can’t describe how disappointed I was with this movie. For a film that’s only 107mins it feels like lengthy 3hr movie; when a movie experience feels like that you know some thing has gone wrong with it. And it was a movie which I had been looking forward to watching for a very long time. Maybe a case of expectations not living up to what it could have been.

Amitabh Bachchan and Saif Ali Khan performances are always good – you sense the movie is made for AB and he does shine throughout it. The less said about the rest of the cast the better. Unbelievably Sanjay Dutt, Jackie Shroff (I remember seeing an interview with Jackie saying he will take any bit role in a VVC film no matter how small the role was, at least he is true to his word) & Jimmy Shergill roles are non-existent in the movie. And if you blink you might even miss the appearance of Sharmila Tagore.

Dissatisfied as I was with Eklavya, I have to say it’s beautifully shot movie and looks amazing. Bit thin on the plot and character development (you hardly feel anything for any one's character apart from Eklavya himself) but still looks a quality production you would expect from VVC. Maybe a second viewing (if a decent DVD appears) might change my opinion but disappointing is how I would describe this movie.

Ali


So, you are saying that everything is fantastic in Eklavya but film doesn't click. This is in direct contrast to V V C's prev film LRMB where nothing is extraordinary but it works.


I have to diff with ali bhaii, all Don, Dhooms, Lakshya, Johar, yrf productions are possibly considered quality products if your criteria are applied man :roll:

I just watched BABEL, and I felt cheated and heavily disappointed, while, cinema, back ground a, acting etc is all A1, but it does not add it all somehow imho!

Imho, Parinda was best of 3, MK was second, Eklavya, down some where! right next to Kareeb.

Parineeta and munna bhaii even all clicked were not above those 2 VVC flicks imho.

nevertheless, i do not even think that this is the most finest performance of AB or Saif either.

I prefer seeing AB in Khuda Gawah over this any day!


So, ali bhaii!! Let me ask your bottom line, without any favortism to the director!

Did you like this film?? and if yes? then why?


Hasn't he already said he was disappointed with it?!

And I don't get how if the 'criteria' is applied, then Dhoom, Don and the Johar productions are quality products - all Ali has said is that the movie has been shot well, and looks like a quality product.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
bhaskar wrote:
arsh wrote:
arsh wrote:
rana wrote:
ali wrote:
I watched it last weekend and I can’t describe how disappointed I was with this movie. For a film that’s only 107mins it feels like lengthy 3hr movie; when a movie experience feels like that you know some thing has gone wrong with it. And it was a movie which I had been looking forward to watching for a very long time. Maybe a case of expectations not living up to what it could have been.

Amitabh Bachchan and Saif Ali Khan performances are always good – you sense the movie is made for AB and he does shine throughout it. The less said about the rest of the cast the better. Unbelievably Sanjay Dutt, Jackie Shroff (I remember seeing an interview with Jackie saying he will take any bit role in a VVC film no matter how small the role was, at least he is true to his word) & Jimmy Shergill roles are non-existent in the movie. And if you blink you might even miss the appearance of Sharmila Tagore.

Dissatisfied as I was with Eklavya, I have to say it’s beautifully shot movie and looks amazing. Bit thin on the plot and character development (you hardly feel anything for any one's character apart from Eklavya himself) but still looks a quality production you would expect from VVC. Maybe a second viewing (if a decent DVD appears) might change my opinion but disappointing is how I would describe this movie.

Ali


So, you are saying that everything is fantastic in Eklavya but film doesn't click. This is in direct contrast to V V C's prev film LRMB where nothing is extraordinary but it works.


I have to diff with ali bhaii, all Don, Dhooms, Lakshya, Johar, yrf productions are possibly considered quality products if your criteria are applied man :roll:

I just watched BABEL, and I felt cheated and heavily disappointed, while, cinema, back ground a, acting etc is all A1, but it does not add it all somehow imho!

Imho, Parinda was best of 3, MK was second, Eklavya, down some where! right next to Kareeb.

Parineeta and munna bhaii even all clicked were not above those 2 VVC flicks imho.

nevertheless, i do not even think that this is the most finest performance of AB or Saif either.

I prefer seeing AB in Khuda Gawah over this any day!


So, ali bhaii!! Let me ask your bottom line, without any favortism to the director!

Did you like this film?? and if yes? then why?


Hasn't he already said he was disappointed with it?!

And I don't get how if the 'criteria' is applied, then Dhoom, Don and the Johar productions are quality products - all Ali has said is that the movie has been shot well, and looks like a quality product.


come on yaar!! if filmed well movies look like quality products then ofcourse criterias applied make those suckers quality products too.

Thanks for trying to back up ali bhaii! as I knew he is a heavy VVC follower!

But, imho, Eklavya has not been shot as well as VVC's previous films either!

Neverthless!! If he was DISAPPOINTED?on theatric viewing! then how on the earth ZEROS dvd will make it an enlightening experience.>??? :roll:
Top
 Profile  
 
bhaskar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2001 3:26 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: Birmingham
arsh wrote:

come on yaar!! if filmed well movies look like quality products then ofcourse criterias applied make those suckers quality products too.

Thanks for trying to back up ali bhaii! as I knew he is a heavy VVC follower!

But, imho, Eklavya has not been shot as well as VVC's previous films either!

Neverthless!! If he was DISAPPOINTED?on theatric viewing! then how on the earth ZEROS dvd will make it an enlightening experience.>??? :roll:


It LOOKS like a quality product - look being the operative word. It's been shot well - Ali didn't say that the story and screenplay were of a high quality film. You can have a B grade film being shot well to look like a quality product - but it'll still be a crap film.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zoran009
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
bhaskar wrote:
arsh wrote:

come on yaar!! if filmed well movies look like quality products then ofcourse criterias applied make those suckers quality products too.

Thanks for trying to back up ali bhaii! as I knew he is a heavy VVC follower!

But, imho, Eklavya has not been shot as well as VVC's previous films either!

Neverthless!! If he was DISAPPOINTED?on theatric viewing! then how on the earth ZEROS dvd will make it an enlightening experience.>??? :roll:


It LOOKS like a quality product - look being the operative word. It's been shot well - Ali didn't say that the story and screenplay were of a high quality film. You can have a B grade film being shot well to look like a quality product - but it'll still be a crap film.


Thanks for verifying! :wink: 8)
Top
 Profile  
 
faddy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 7:25 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Sunny Manchester..............
ive not seen it.. but all i can say is its only a film.. throw your Amitabh sentiments aside and judge a movie by its merits and not by Amitabh being in it.. quite frankly he is churning out some bullshit movies lately and no one can say they are decent.. look at baabul..
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6 of 10
  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Board index » Others » Movie, TV, Music and Box-office

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group