It is currently Sat Sep 27, 2025 10:01 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Rate the DVD (not the movie), out of 5, 1 pretty bad, 5 excellent
1 33%  33%  [ 4 ]
2 25%  25%  [ 3 ]
3 25%  25%  [ 3 ]
4 8%  8%  [ 1 ]
5 8%  8%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 12
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Title Shabd
Cast Aishwarya Rai, Sanjay Dutt, Zayed Khan
Brand/Distributor EROS/B4U
Subtitles English
Year 2005

Ali


Last edited by ali on Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
I have not seen it, but going by eros recent master pieces, I'll rate it 1.5. because I have seen worse! :evil:


Last edited by Zoran009 on Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 10:11 pm
Posts: 1203
Location: vancouver, canada
do u think this will be the recently chopped off version that had words like "sardar" in it or will it be the original version that has the "sardar" scene? i think it might be the original version since the censor board issued it 2-3 days ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:05 pm
Posts: 1764
Location: God's Country!
:oops:


Last edited by JamesBond007 on Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:55 pm
Posts: 1508
Rita wrote:
arsh wrote:
I have not seen it, but going by eros recent master pieces, I'll rate it 1.5. because I have seen worse! :evil:


ROFLOL How can you rate something you've never seen? :roll:

just like me. lol. going by eros track record, all are -5 if Ali would've been so kind to post negative values. they should pay us to watch their crap! :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Three screen shots from the Xvid rip by BrG;

Image

Image

Image

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
I've given it 3 based on those screen shots.

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
ali wrote:
Image

Ali


You can see fine facial hair just right of the earings. So, definitely no "field averaging" here. :D

PQ rating:
Assuming it to be Pseudo-Prog and not totally "Progressive" I give it a 3. (Minimum 4 if it's Progressive)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 5:53 pm
Posts: 14989
rana wrote:
ali wrote:
Image

Ali


You can see fine facial hair just right of the earings. So, definitely no "field averaging" here. :D

PQ rating:
Assuming it to be Pseudo-Prog and not totally "Progressive" I give it a 3. (Minimum 4 if it's Progressive)


I doubt it rana!! but i am ready to be wrong than right!
ali is consistent his bad rating use to be 6/10, now 3/5 :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:05 pm
Posts: 1764
Location: God's Country!
So she forget to shave! But not conclusive, it could be pseudo-prog. Allowing for down sampling the pq looks a little soft but fair and badly cropped? 2.5/5 :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
JamesBond007 wrote:
badly cropped


??

I see AR of about 2.5:1 (or may be even 2.6:1).

Cropped from Sides or from Top and/ or Bottom??
As someone clarified on zulm before, cropping is cutting of pic from sides and cutting from top and bottom is over-matting??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
Few more shots from the same rip;

Image

Image

Image

Specs according to BrG NFO;

Res: 640x272, 2.35:1 AR
Framerate: 29.971
Video bit rate of Xvid: 1295 kb/s
Running time: 02:20:39

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 2:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2002 10:05 pm
Posts: 1764
Location: God's Country!
Quote:
2.35:1 AR


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:46 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 2:06 pm
Posts: 4944
Location: UK
These shots are from the DVD (I think, you can never tell when nicking from other sites :twisted: ) - anyhow the AR still 2.35:1 :baaa:

Image

Image

Image

Ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6146
Why so much difference in PQ between Rip and EROS??

Is it that rip is from the original telecine (PAL) and EROS one is it's conversion to NTSC and nth copy??

Also, Ali, could you please change the poll title to reflect the fact that most of us gave the relatively high PQ rating, looking at the rip shots and not the actual DVD.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group