It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:58 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
NewDeep wrote:
Separate from all this, I also remember that initially Sholay (theatrical) did not run -- that version was "Sholay," it had comedy scenes, and it had Gabbar NOT dying, and it also had all those extended B4U sequences in Ali-Rana notes. Everything the same except the ending! When it did not run, the film crew thought that possibly the villain still alive after so many "good men" and Amitabh dying was not acceptable to the public. So they reshot the end! Yes... if my memory serves me right, I read that they reshot the end with Gabbar dying, but at the last moment, thought best not to use that scene at all (in theatres...).


I just found something to support my "memories" and I quote:

The first week was a difficult one for Sholay, creating a minor stir amongst the producers and distributors. 16

16. Conversation with scriptwriter, Javed Akhtar, Bombay March 1995. Akhtar recalled how Ramesh Sippy called a meeting of the lead stars and the scriptwriters to discuss possible modifications to the films ending and a reworking of the Gabbar Singh persona which many had seen as excessively cruel. Everyone decided to wait for another week. The story of Sholay’s subsequent success is now part of film folklore.

http://www.india-seminar.com/2003/525/5 ... zumdar.htm

"The wait another week" meant not using the "Gabbar dead at end" reshoot in the theatre, though they had already shot it--creating a "parallel" movie. So perhaps, the original intention was always to let Gabbar live... that was the director's cut...

Finally, however, a "sanshodhit" and shortened version did come out in the theatres... so the theatres saw all the versions...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
A lots more by Raj at:

viewtopic.php?t=4496&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

and continued in the next page:

viewtopic.php?t=4496&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45


:D

I think, it's mentioned in the above threads that:

Danny was supposed to play Gabbar. He left (may be dates prob) a month before shooting was to start.

Sanjeev Kumar's role was meant for Pran??

Gabbar dying was not passed by the Indian Censors and hence they showed Gabbar being arrested.

Villager on fire was also rejected by Indian Censors.

--------------------------

What Sholay version was shown theatrically in India when it was revived in the past few months??

-----------------------------

(more comments/ enqs later)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: more sholay
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
rana wrote:
--------------------------

What Sholay version was shown theatrically in India when it was revived in the past few months??



I have not seen the new cinemascope release but if they had shown Gabbar dying in the end, it would definitely have made big news... but there was not any... so it is safe to assume that Gabbar does not die in the re-release. Plus, the re-release was done by someone who bought the rights of Sholay fro the Sippys... so he could not have changed anything. One other fact -- No one in India (meaning "common man" like me :-) )seems to be aware that Gabbar dies in any version... I have met scores of people of all ages... none recall anything like that.


Did you get a chance to see the censor certificate again on your DVD? What does it say? Sholay or Sholay-Sanshodhit?

Plus, after the film failed to get a good opening, and then if the cast decided to wait a week and did not change the ending, and if the ending everyone saw was Gabbar being carried away by the police, then this contradicts the more popular opinion... How about inviting Ramesh Sippy to this thread :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: more sholay
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
NewDeep wrote:


I have not seen the new cinemascope release but if they had shown Gabbar dying in the end, it would definitely have made big news... but there was not any... so it is safe to assume that Gabbar does not die in the re-release. Plus, the re-release was done by someone who bought the rights of Sholay fro the Sippys... so he could not have changed anything. One other fact -- No one in India (meaning "common man" like me :-) )seems to be aware that Gabbar dies in any version... I have met scores of people of all ages... none recall anything like that.


Did you get a chance to see the censor certificate again on your DVD? What does it say? Sholay or Sholay-Sanshodhit?

Plus, after the film failed to get a good opening, and then if the cast decided to wait a week and did not change the ending, and if the ending everyone saw was Gabbar being carried away by the police, then this contradicts the more popular opinion... How about inviting Ramesh Sippy to this thread :-)


CAUTION: Don't count on Censor Certificate in EROS Director's Cut DVD. Why; Read On:

Censor Cert in EROS Director's Cut DVD that released after Yr 2000, is dated Aug 12, 1975, expiring on Aug 11, 1985. Obviously, this Censor Cert does not correspond to the DIRECTOR's CUT presented in the DVD. Nothing New in the web of lies rampant in Indian Film/ DVD industry.

Censor Cert says SHOLAY Shanshodhit) in Hindi and SHOLAY (Revised) in English and is 2.35:1 AR. I'm sure this Cens Cert belongs to the 1975 original 70mm theatrical release (Couldn't read clearly whether CC has 35mm or 70mm written on it but it appears to be 70mm that's scribbled (No. On closer examination, it says 35mm gage) ). It's 'revised' as original version where Gabbar dies was not passed by censors and hence producers submitted a revised version and hence the name SHOLAY (Shanshodhit).

BTW, as stated before elsewhere, Cut 45% from top and bottom from the EROS Director's Cut version and you get the 70mm theatrical print. Cut further 35% from the sides and you get the DEI-EROS version.

-------------------------------

I don't think Gabbar dying version has been passed by Indian censors. Director's Cut is for outside India (No Censors).


Last edited by rana on Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
rana wrote:
Censor Cert says SHOLAY Shanshodhit) in Hindi and SHOLAY (Revised) in English and is 2.35:1 AR. I'm sure this Cens Cert belongs to the 1975 original 70mm theatrical release (Couldn't read clearly whether CC has 35mm or 70mm written on it but it appears to be 70mm that's scribbled). It's 'revised' as original version where Gabbar dies was not passed by censors and hence producers submitted a revised version and hence the name SHOLAY (Shanshodhit).


I can see the censor certificate clearly on my VHS as well as ULTRA DVD... it says "Sholay Sanshodhit" and "35 mm" -- it does not say "70 mm." This may be because it was only some of the positives that were 70 mm though the initial shoot was on 35 mm film.

Also, for all practical purposes, I think we have two separate films:
1. Sholay
2. Sholay Sanshodhit
Even the Censor Board India archives would show records of two separate films I think.

This is similar to the extended and digitized release of THE GOOD THE BAD THE UGLY in the U.S. The earlier release and the new one are recognized in the U.S. as separate movies.

I still want to investigate what really happened when Sholay did not run in its first week. At that time, Ramesh Sippy wanted to change the ending, but everyone else said "Let's wait a week more..." Sippy agreed and did not change the ending... and if he did not change it, and if it was still Gabbar-lives, then where exactly does the gabbar-dies version fit?

(BTW, as an aside, it will interest you to know that the all-colour Mughal-E-Azam is actually about 5 to 10 minutes shorter than the original release... a whole song is missing.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
Made Correction in my post above, describing Cens Cert on EROS DVD.

Film Gage is stated as 35mm on that Cens Cert.

--------------------------------------------

When they thought that Sholay was rejected, they were thinking of changing it to happy ending by not letting AB die.

---------------------------------------------

(I started comparing Mughal-E-Azam EROS and Shemaroo versions a few weeks back. It's very time cosuming and so far I have reached only the 35 min mark on the 2 DVDs. For complete run time comparison, I want to include my VHS's as well but the sequences are mixed up in VHS.
Eventually, one day I will finish comparing it.)


Last edited by rana on Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
rana wrote:
I don't think Gabbar dying version has been pssed by Indian censors. Director's Cut is for outside India (No Censors).


Even outside, at least in the U.K., Sholay Sanshodhit has been shown to censors for theatrical release. The version which is 198 minutes.

British Film Classification (earlier known as British Censors) have an archive of three "Sholay" requests:

1. The 198min-3s version with 4s cut - for theatres - released by Eros <<<=== clearly one of the Sholay-sanshodhit no Gabbar killing versions.

2. The 188min-28s version with 15s cut (on PAL I think) - for video - released by Orson Video

3. The 204-min-36s version with 10s cut (on NTSC I think) - for video - released by Sipsons Video World

rana wrote:
...I started comparing MEA EROS and Shemaroo versions a few weeks back...


The Shemaroo version is news! Is it available in India?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Sholay - How gabbar Dies
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
raj wrote:
Gabbar dies in 'Sholay' Or at least does in the original 'Sholay' that Ramesh had shot, Salim-Javed had written. The Thakur kills Gabbar with his feet, wearing shoes that the servant Ramlal has fashioned with nails fitted in the soles. The armless Thakur first crushes Gabbar's arms. Then they stand face to face, two armless warriors, two equals. And then the Thakur pounds Gabbar to death as if he were a venomous snake;
he does not stop till the dacoit is a bloody mess under his shoes. Then he breaks down and cries.


IMPORTANT Question for all those who have seen the 204-minute DVD.

Is this how Gabbar dies? The Thakur pounding him like a snake and not stopping until he's a bloody mess under his shoes?

The reason I ask is that a Malaysian VCD (full frame) that I have of Sholay - does show Gabbar dying, but not like this...

What actually is shown on my VCD is that Thakur gives a big kick on Gabbar's stomach, and Gabbar is pushed backwards towards a pole that has a protruding spike. This enters Gabbar's body as his back crashes against the pole and he then falls on the ground...

Guys, please let us know which ending is there on your extended DVD... Does any of you actually have Thakur killing Gabbar by pounding him to death under his feet?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
NewDeep wrote:


rana wrote:
...I started comparing MEA EROS and Shemaroo versions a few weeks back...


The Shemaroo version is news! Is it available in India?


Best MEA (Mughl-e-Azam) DVD is Shemaroo. Of course Shemaroo DVD is for Indian Market.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
NewDeep wrote:
raj wrote:
Gabbar dies in 'Sholay' Or at least does in the original 'Sholay' that Ramesh had shot, Salim-Javed had written. The Thakur kills Gabbar with his feet, wearing shoes that the servant Ramlal has fashioned with nails fitted in the soles. The armless Thakur first crushes Gabbar's arms. Then they stand face to face, two armless warriors, two equals. And then the Thakur pounds Gabbar to death as if he were a venomous snake;
he does not stop till the dacoit is a bloody mess under his shoes. Then he breaks down and cries.


IMPORTANT Question for all those who have seen the 204-minute DVD.

Is this how Gabbar dies? The Thakur pounding him like a snake and not stopping until he's a bloody mess under his shoes?

The reason I ask is that a Malaysian VCD (full frame) that I have of Sholay - does show Gabbar dying, but not like this...

What actually is shown on my VCD is that Thakur gives a big kick on Gabbar's stomach, and Gabbar is pushed backwards towards a pole that has a protruding spike. This enters Gabbar's body as his back crashes against the pole and he then falls on the ground...

Guys, please let us know which ending is there on your extended DVD... Does any of you actually have Thakur killing Gabbar by pounding him to death under his feet?


In EROS Director's Cut 204 min version, Gabbar dies the way NewDeep described. Trempling under spiked shoes is used to finish off Gabbar's hands/arms only. After that it's Head to Head hits and Sanjeev's flying tackles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
rana wrote:
NewDeep wrote:


rana wrote:
...I started comparing MEA EROS and Shemaroo versions a few weeks back...


The Shemaroo version is news! Is it available in India?


Best MEA (Mughl-e-Azam) DVD is Shemaroo. Of course Shemaroo DVD is for Indian Market.


My mistake! I thought MEA was another brand of Sholay DVD. :lol:
Mughal E Azam (MEA) - I have the Shemaroo 2-tape VHS (PAL I think), the Shemaroo B/W DVD, and tlll some days back, I also had the Shemaroo new colour 2-disc DVD.

I returned the colour DVD because it skipped at many places and had bad fluctuating video at others... it was not just my DVD that had problems - the entire stock was bad and the store in India where I buy DVDs from was flooded with complaints. Also the DVD incorrectly says "anamorphic widescreen 2.35:1" - it is actually full frame! Plus they said that the deleted song is present on the bonus disc but it was not :-(

A song is missing from the colour release...


Last edited by newDEEP [go-green] on Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
rana wrote:

--------------------------------------------

When they thought that Sholay was rejected, they were thinking of changing it to happy ending by not letting AB die.

---------------------------------------------


raj wrote:
50.Sholay

viewtopic.php?t=4496&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45

There was no reaction. On Friday, 15 August, the first day of 'Sholay's release, Ramesh drove from one theatre to another to assess the reaction of the audience. As on the premiere night, there was only silence.
Over the weekend, panic set in. The theatres were full but the reports were mixed. Pundits were now predicting disaster. No one told Ramesh that, but he could see it in their faces of all those he met.
Every one wore that peculiar expression of pity and awkwardness. They met him like he was a man in mourning.

The Sippys moved into damage-control mode. On the weekend, a hurried meeting was convened at Amitabh's house. G.P Sippy, Ramesh and Amitabh put their heads together to try and come up with solutions. Since there was no fear of piracy at the time, the release of the film in the major territories was being staggered. They could make substantial alterations before 'Sholay' hit the rest of the country.
One suggestion was re-shooting the end again. Amitabh, post'Zanjeer' and 'Deewar', was too big a star to die.
Jai was just a petty thief, he hadn't done anything to deserve death. Perhaps an ending in which the two couples walk into the sunset would salvage the film.


Salim-Javed were vehement that the film shouldn't be touched. Ramesh considered the suggestion for a new ending, but not for long. His head said he should do it but his heart wouldn't allow it. He went with his heart A happy end would compromise his film even further. It was important that the audience leave the theatre with a feeling that something had been left unfinished. That slight ache in the heart was part of the film's appeal. Not a frame would be touched. He would swim or sink with the film.



Last edited by rana on Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:00 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: THREE ENDINGS? (SHOLAY)
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
rana wrote:
NewDeep wrote:
raj wrote:
Gabbar dies in 'Sholay' Or at least does in the original 'Sholay' that Ramesh had shot, Salim-Javed had written. The Thakur kills Gabbar with his feet, wearing shoes that the servant Ramlal has fashioned with nails fitted in the soles. The armless Thakur first crushes Gabbar's arms. Then they stand face to face, two armless warriors, two equals. And then the Thakur pounds Gabbar to death as if he were a venomous snake;
he does not stop till the dacoit is a bloody mess under his shoes. Then he breaks down and cries.


IMPORTANT Question for all those who have seen the 204-minute DVD.

Is this how Gabbar dies? The Thakur pounding him like a snake and not stopping until he's a bloody mess under his shoes?

The reason I ask is that a Malaysian VCD (full frame) that I have of Sholay - does show Gabbar dying, but not like this...

What actually is shown on my VCD is that Thakur gives a big kick on Gabbar's stomach, and Gabbar is pushed backwards towards a pole that has a protruding spike. This enters Gabbar's body as his back crashes against the pole and he then falls on the ground...

Guys, please let us know which ending is there on your extended DVD... Does any of you actually have Thakur killing Gabbar by pounding him to death under his feet?


In EROS Director's Cut 204 min version, Gabbar dies the way NewDeep described. Trempling under spiked shoes is used to finish off Gabbar's hands/arms only. After that it's Head to Head hits and Sanjeev's flying tackles.


Thanks Rana! Anyone else?

So Rana, if what Raj says is true, then is it possible that there were actually three endings :

- one in which Thakur kills Gabbar by pounding him to death with his feet (this may have been the one the censors rejected and which no one ever saw either in theatre or on DVDs)

- another in which Gabbar lives on (the popular theatrical release everyone saw)

- yet another in which Gabbar is killed by the prodruding spike when Thakur kicks him (which made it to some DVDs)

:arrow: P.S. - Please correct me if I am wrong, but a lot of what Raj has written on Sholay seems to be "lifted" from printed books (Anupama Chopra's and Wimal Dissanayake's books).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2001 7:27 pm
Posts: 6143
rana wrote:
NewDeep wrote:
raj wrote:
Gabbar dies in 'Sholay' Or at least does in the original 'Sholay' that Ramesh had shot, Salim-Javed had written. The Thakur kills Gabbar with his feet, wearing shoes that the servant Ramlal has fashioned with nails fitted in the soles. The armless Thakur first crushes Gabbar's arms. Then they stand face to face, two armless warriors, two equals. And then the Thakur pounds Gabbar to death as if he were a venomous snake;
he does not stop till the dacoit is a bloody mess under his shoes. Then he breaks down and cries.


IMPORTANT Question for all those who have seen the 204-minute DVD.

Is this how Gabbar dies? The Thakur pounding him like a snake and not stopping until he's a bloody mess under his shoes?

The reason I ask is that a Malaysian VCD (full frame) that I have of Sholay - does show Gabbar dying, but not like this...

What actually is shown on my VCD is that Thakur gives a big kick on Gabbar's stomach, and Gabbar is pushed backwards towards a pole that has a protruding spike. This enters Gabbar's body as his back crashes against the pole and he then falls on the ground...

Guys, please let us know which ending is there on your extended DVD... Does any of you actually have Thakur killing Gabbar by pounding him to death under his feet?


In EROS Director's Cut 204 min version, Gabbar dies the way NewDeep described. Trempling under spiked shoes is used to finish off Gabbar's hands/arms only. After that it's Head to Head hits and Sanjeev's flying tackles.


Actually, it's the DEI-EROS version that has Sanjeev Kumar about to trample on Babbar's face when Police arrives.
In EROS Director's cut version, Sanjeev is never shown about to crush Babbar's face.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 2769
Location: I N D I A
Thx Rana!

So,

1. First ending - as on theatrical screenings, DEI EROS DVD, ULTRA DVD, and GOLD VHS - Thakur is about to bring his foot down on Gabbar's face when the police arrives and urges him to hand over Gabbar alive. Thakur lets Gabbar live. This is the most popular ending and known to everyone and seen by almost everyone.

2. Second ending - as on the 204-minutes B4U DVD - Thakur kicks Gabbar in the stomach; Gabbar's back hits a pole on which a protruding spike pierces Gabbar's back - this kills Gabbar.

3. Third ending (mystery question) - as written in Anupama Sharma's book (I think) and as reproduced by Raj on this forum - Thakur kills Gabbar under his feet, like a venomous snake, pounding him under his feet until Gabbar is a bloody mess (and dead) -- This, if true, is a third ending, and I do not think anyone has seen this so far. It is possible that this is inaccurately captured in the books on Sholay (and reproduced by Raj).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group