monizam wrote:
why dont you look up "ethics"in the dictionary.Ethics got nothing to do with the choice of encoding interlaced or progressive dvd. Thats aa choice authors have and in no way unethical.
How is using masters that could be 5 or even 10 years old to make a DVD ethical? DVD is capable of certain standards and most of these companies are not even trying to meet them. I didn't buy a DVD player so I could get VHS and VCD transfers with chapter stops and menus.
Quote:
Both methods are legal.For you to suggest that its unethical for interlacedis purely horseshit
People have certain expectations of DVD format, and when people start buying these DVDs expecting better quality than VHS and they get the same quality, that is completely unethical. Who ever claimed it was illegal? Something can be unethical and legal at the same time.
Quote:
as a matter of fact 99% of the people dont give a shit whether its progressive or interlaced..
People have no standards, and look at the quality of Indian DVDs today. It boggles my mind that people are actually willing to fork over their money for utter crap DVDs. The quality of the experience is just as important as being able to finish the movie, and I will not buy a DVD that doesn't deliver on both terms.