I would like to know too! set up, display, play back, vision, all matters lol

The best 1942 we have is from DEI(luckily) but unfortunately cropped! It is criminal to crop WS dvds. If OAR can be restored but not cropped/chopped! It is unfortunate that with all those technologies, equipment etc, shemaroo is still making cropped dvds mostly and even cropping anamorphic new dvds at times!

It is UNFORTUNATE VVC created such a hoopla mess re sending his crap film to oscar but can not get it done!his better films mastered right for dvd! He was lucky sony owned MK! and we will get a good bluray dvd in matter of time for MK and Lagaan, but I wish Asoka should make to BLURAY too!

wasn't mission kashmir done by shemaroo? and also by eros? thankfully parineeta was excel.

FarooqBhai, may I ask what the need to beat someone to the punch?

and where in SoCal do you live? if you don't mind me asking...I'm in LA

I have the one by Columbia Tristar? You do know there is a Columbia Tristar/Sony DVD of it, right?

I dont know if Shem ever re did MK for indian community! But it was CT dvd done by SONY, excellent dvd with full 5.1 ENGLISH DUB that some how I always enjoyed!

Thank God ZEROS did not get a chance to screw this one! Parineeta was UTV/EXCEL.
Kareeb/Parinda DEI/EROS, both cropped!

Eklavya..exclusive ZEROS!

Wow!! that might be an absolute disadvantage! If newdeep did not know that?

He should acquire it asap, or wait for bluray!

mission kashmir dvd in india is definitely either shemaroo or eros or both... excel had requested its license, but...

Do not tell me that shemaroo cropped it too!

i have either eros or shemaroo -- it is cropped and non-anamorphic (mission kashmir) if i remember correctly -- can confirm over the weekend....

I live in Cerritos just 1.5km away from Little India...

As for your first question, not important to discuss here, sorry

farooq,

Hope that post didnt come across as "it wasnt much better" because that's not true at all, i was just making an observation.

As for what I viewed it on, I have two setups. One is a 57" Hitachi 1080i rear projection television. Yes I know it's old technology but I think the picture quality on this set is still heaps better than some of the newer plasmas and lcds (although its definitely not as sharp). That's just connected to a regular dvd player via component output (there's no HDMI capability on the tv) so the tv upscales to 1080i. On this setup, any PAL-NTSC transfers or vice versa show up very badly but pseudo-progressive discs come out without too many problems.

The second set is a newer 46" Sharp Aquos LCD which is 1080P, again connected to a regular dvd player via component output. I should really get a HDMI upconverting player but I havent yet, mainly because the picture generally looks quite good anyway upscaled by the TV. This set handles both PAL-NTSC (and vice versa) or pseudo-progressive discs fine. The one thing I notice on this set more than the older tv is digital artifacting. I dont know if this is because its sharper and every defect is amplified but it definitely shows up more problems than the Hitachi.

The remastered disc looks better on both, but like I said, on a general viewing you wouldnt notice it unless you were specifically trying to compare the two.

Also, Farooq you have a PM.

I was going to write about the samething Nitin77 already wrote...

When viewing the EROS DVD on my Sony HDTV.. The DVD looked good, and before I got the DVD I was expecting a dull viewing experience from everything I saw posted about the DVD in this post.

Again this mainly because my Panasonic DVD player is upcoverting the DVD before sending video to my HDTV.

can anyone phone eros and find out whats happening with the blu ray?

be OUR GUEST man!